On
August 3rd, 1999 the trial had to be repeated, and the sentence No. 117/99
again skipped to notice the crime of Trespassing; and although they found the five
accused guilty of illegal search, the wording of the sentence laid the
groundwork for the defense in order that a Cassation recourse might prosper
eventually, and so being able to absolve the three inspectors finally. I
presented Request of amendment of the sentence questioning the evident help
given by the judge Major Luis Alberto Coca Valdes to the accused. But the
request was obviously denied, adducing: “..it is trivial and empty of
significance the substitution of the words used in the wording of the sentence
for those suggested by the aggrieved, for the sustenance of the process.. ”. I
had requested that in the FIRST RESULTING, in sheet 2 of the sentence, in line
20, instead of saying “the inspection and seek...” It should be consigned: “The
search and seek...” Insofar as the FIRST POSTULATE was indicating as proven the
consummated crime of Illegal Search. To be continued...
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario