Let there be light Sixth Part Extraordinary 160

Why did the Attorney General's Office of the Republic tolerate my insults, and did not answer back on January 3rd, 2001, when impugning answer R # 1918/2000 from Vice Attorney General, Rafael Pino Becquer, I considered it unfounded, illegal, unconstitutional and mainly unjust; and among other discharges, I presented that Vice Attorney General Pino Becquer, omitted to examine and to solve the most transcendental, unjust, illegal and unconstitutional antecedent of the whole file of the case in issue; missing the truth of the facts without reason; and then calls this rough, vulgar, shameful, illegal, unjust and unconstitutional process "Legal Paths"? To be continued...