Let there be light Sixth Part Extraordinary 153

Why did the Attorney General's Office consider intolerable my insults to hold me in contempt on May 14th, 2002, after a long period of time, since 1997, of constant emplacements in each new complaint, and without having given course to the Accusation against the Attorney General of the Republic, of November  2001? Why did the Attorney General's Office of the Republic tolerate, and did not reply to Lawyer Antonio D. Gainza Perez, when on July 9th, 1997, questioning their work in his second impugnation to this instance, established “It is really worrisome than in front of the reclamation of the civic rights and the flagrant violation of the same that was denounced besides in the only organ that exists in our country to safeguard the reestablishment of legality, we observe how first they violate the terms established to give answer and next they try to establish as correct (by means of extensive and not foreseen methods of interpretation in the law) the illegal and incorrect acting of the inspectors of fishing whose analysis does not resist the most minimal interrogation either of fact or right ”.? To be continued...