Let there be light Sixth Part Extraordinary 158

Why did the Attorney General's Office of the Republic tolerate my insults, and did not answer back on August 20th, 2000, when requesting the Council of State the separation of the District Attorney Maria Del Carmen Romero Perez, chief of the Direction of Civic Rights Protection of the Attorney General's Office of the Republic, for manifest incompetence, negligence or inexcusable ignorance; I Said:".. This is not the first time that I denounce the Negligent, illegal and even accessory attitude, of the Attorney Maria Del Carmen Romero, and she accepts it with silence and prevents my complaints on her getting to the Attorney General, answering them herself without referring to my discharges."? To be continued... 

Let there be light Sixth Part Extraordinary 157

Why did the Attorney General's Office of the Republic tolerate my insults, and did not answer back on July 20th, 2000 when impugning the answer 232537 of Havana City Provincial Attorney's Office, of date 4\6\2000, I denounced: ".. In front of the Evident complicity of several Attorneys in the Breaking-Up of the Legality observed in my case, which include the Attorneys Orlando Martin Sanchez, Vladimir Núñez Herrera, Luis Pablo Ibáñez Silva, Angel Ortiz Nodarse, Maria Del Carmen Romero Perez and Raúl López Pertierra, the last three ones of the Attorney General's Office of the Republic, against whom I have presented Complaints to the Attorney General in several occasions, without having been able to avoid that these complaints had been answered by the very implicated Attorneys.."? To be continued...

Let there be light Sixth Part Extraordinary 156

Why did the Attorney General's Office of the Republic tolerate my insults, and did not answer back on April 24th, 2000, when impugning the answer of the Attorney General's Office that denied my request of Revision Procedure of the cause 267/99 of the People's Municipal Court of Cienfuegos, settled for the crime of Defamation, I presented: "..Should he be very stupid or immoral the official that intends to search excuse in an alleged imperfection of Cuban Procedural Penal law to cover up or to conceal the Influential accused in issue.."? Why did the Attorney General's Office of the Republic tolerate my insults, and did not answer back on May 30th, 2000, when in impugnation addressed to the Attorney General of the Republic, against the answer 848 of the Provincial Attorney's Office of Cienfuegos, of date May 15th, 2000 I alleged: ".. The procedure and later answer given by Chief Attorney of the Provincial Attorney's Office of Cienfuegos, Luis Pablo Ibáñez Silva, could not be more superficial, negligent, paternalist, unjust and illegal? To be continued...

Let there be light Sixth Part Extraordinary 155

Why did the Attorney General's Office of the Republic tolerate my insults, and did not answer back on March 15th, 2000, when I wrote to Commander In Chief, Fidel Castro Ruz, denouncing among other things:

A.- "..The answer of the Attorney Vladimir Nuñez Herrera, was an insult to our family, to good judgment, to reason, to logic, to policy, to the Cuban laws, to his companions, to the Attorney General's Office, and to our lawyer Antonio Gainza.."

B.- ".. The legal adviser of the Minister of fishing, in an expression of pushiness, disdain, and disrespect to legality, omitted the duty of giving answer to our formal request; in violation of the article 63 of the Constitution of the Republic, and of the article 52 subsections r ) and a ) of the Law of Organization of the Central state Administration.."

C.- ".. It is outrageous and shameful, that a formal complaint that was made with legal assistance on January 30th, 1997 reaches the year 2000, and perhaps further, because of unscrupulous interests that avoid rectifying errors, at the expense of a grave economic , psychic and moral damage to an honest family, and more serious still, at the expense of the denigration of the judicial system.

D- ".. This is all the Vice Attorney General, Colonel Felipe Aleman Cruz, Chief of the Military Prosecutor's Office responded to a complaint that tells about flagrant Trespassing, abuse, denigration of our justice system, and immorality.? To be continued...

Let there be light Sixth Part Extraordinary 154

Why did the Attorney General's Office of the Republic tolerate my insults, and did not answer back on February 12th, 2000, when in a letter of complaint to the Attorney General of the Republic, for violation of the Socialist Legality by the director of Legal Assistance of the Ministry of Justice, Mr. Urbano Pedraza Linares, I denounced: ".. If with all the facts, proofs, reasons, and foundations by right shown by me, the Ministry of Justice refuses to admit my Request for Revision Procedure as the only way to achieve the reparation of the moral damage infringed to my honor; ..I dare to assure, and of course ready to prove it, that the letter and spirit of our Constitution is being manipulated in a prejudiced, unjust and illegal form, in relation to the litigation aroused for the four pounds of shrimps illegally occupied at my home.."? To be continued...

Let there be light Sixth Part Extraordinary 153

Why did the Attorney General's Office consider intolerable my insults to hold me in contempt on May 14th, 2002, after a long period of time, since 1997, of constant emplacements in each new complaint, and without having given course to the Accusation against the Attorney General of the Republic, of November  2001? Why did the Attorney General's Office of the Republic tolerate, and did not reply to Lawyer Antonio D. Gainza Perez, when on July 9th, 1997, questioning their work in his second impugnation to this instance, established “It is really worrisome than in front of the reclamation of the civic rights and the flagrant violation of the same that was denounced besides in the only organ that exists in our country to safeguard the reestablishment of legality, we observe how first they violate the terms established to give answer and next they try to establish as correct (by means of extensive and not foreseen methods of interpretation in the law) the illegal and incorrect acting of the inspectors of fishing whose analysis does not resist the most minimal interrogation either of fact or right ”.? To be continued...

Let there be light Sixth Part Extraordinary 152

The Attorney General's Office considers my insults intolerable. They instructed me that from the year 1997 and to that date (2002), after the application in 1996 of the Decree-Law 164 to my wife, I had expressed offenses and insults toward different attorneys, like to the Vice Attorney General Mr. Rafael Pino Bécquer, Chief of Assistantship Direction, whom I had called corrupt; to Luis Pablo Ibáñez Silva, Provincial Chief Attorney whom I called immoral; And that I had rated answer of Francisco Javier Fernandez Guerra, Assistantship Director of the Attorney General's Office of the Republic as accessory and his acting as prepotent and cynical; calling him lier as well as Mr. Rafael Pino Bécquer. To be continued... 

Let there be light Sixth Part Extraordinary 151

As I expected the legal course of my well-founded accusation against General Juan Escalona Regueira was obstructed; and when on March 26th, 2002 I put a Complaint for Lawbreaking of Penal Procedure in the Accusation against the Attorney General of the Republic, they decided to play their last card to silence me once and for all; and on May 14th, I was summoned to the police Station of my home town, Abreus; where I was informed of the start of a file of preparatory phase for Denunciation No. 152-20, for the Crime of Contempt. I knew Castro's government had eliminated from the crime code a pre-revolutionary provision, that allowed those charged with contempt to invoke the truthfulness of their statements as a defense; so I decided to hire a fourth lawyer, the best one available, and of course, in Havana; and Ivan Celestrín was finally my choice. To be continued...

Hágase la Luz Sexta Parte Extraordinaria 150

¿Por qué muchos cubanos no firman la Petición de Denuncia a las Cortes de Derechos Humanos contra la Manipulación y Secuestro de la Constitución de Cuba por los Castros?

1-Limitación del Derecho a la libre información.-Todos sabemos que en Cuba el acceso a Internet es escaso y controlado por el régimen.

2-Desconocimiento.-La falta de tiempo y lo complejo de la política muchas veces hace que las personas no comprendan con claridad el mensaje y el objetivo de determinada iniciativa.

3-Incomprensión.-También sucede que aunque tienen conocimientos de política y tiempo para estudiar la iniciativa no la comprenden o confunden su objetivo.

4-Miedo.-El natural que quien ha vivido casi toda su vida bajo una dictadura totalitaria, aún después de liberarse continúen sintiendo miedo a las posibles represalias del régimen a la hora de regresar a su país para visitar sus seres queridos.

5-Desconfianza.-Otros que aunque son disidentes y críticos activos del régimen en las redes sociales desconfían del fruto que puede rendir determinada iniciativa y optan por no apoyarla a expensas incluso de favorecer al régimen con semejante actitud.

6-Apatía.-Lamentablemente para la mayoría de las iniciativas y proyectos políticos que se lanzan en las redes sociales, existe un número significativo de personas que simplemente no les interesa la política, aunque hayan sido víctimas de ella, y viven a su aire sin importarles nada más que lo que les afecta directa e inmediatamente a ellos mismos.

7-Castristas.-La realidad es dura pero hay que aceptarla; hay todavía quien cree y defiende a los Castros, abierta o solapadamente.

Es nuestro trabajo descubrir cuál de estos motivos justifica la falta de apoyo de los que nos niegan o no nos dan su firma y encaminar nuestros esfuerzos en los casos que sea posible a tratar de cambiar la situación a nuestro favor.

Let There be light Sixth Part Extraordinary 149

In 2001 I continued with my demands and accusations, but the lack of justice and respect for Human Rights always prevailed as an inherent feature of Castro's dictatorship. On January 8th, I sent an Impugnation Letter to the Attorney General of the Republic. But on May 8th, I had to insist on my Impugnation again; and as it was evident that they were violating their duty, on November 11th, I had no other alternative than to make a Formal Accusation against the Attorney General of the Republic, General Juan Escalona Regueira, for the Crime of Prevarication. To be continued...

Let there be light Sixth Part Extraordinary 148

The following year 2000, after I had delivered a COMPLAINT on February 12th for violation of Legality against Urbano Pedraza Linares, director of Legal Assistance at the Ministry of Justice; and after I had written my first Complaint to Commander in Chief Fidel Castro on March 15th, informing him that it was outrageous and shameful that a formal Accusation made under legal assistance on January 30th, 1997 had reached the year 2000, and perhaps later, because of unscrupulous interests evading to rectify errors at the expense of a serious economic, psychological and moral damage for my whole family, and even worse, at the expense of the denigration of the Cuban judicial system; on April 24th I formally denounced of Prevarication the two judges involved in the contrary to law acquittal of  the accused Navy commander Diaz Padron. Likewise, on April 25th, 2000, I accused Major Luis Alberto Coca Valdes, Court-Martial President who dictated sentence No.117, in the cause No.68 of 1999, at the Court-Martial's seat of Cienfuegos Garrison, for the Crime of Prevarication,  accusation ceased temporarily, even without allowing me to depose. And finally that year, on August 20th I applied to the State Council for the SEPARATION of María del Carmen Romero Pérez, as Chief of the Direction of Civic Rights Protection at the Attorney General's Office of the Republic for gross incompetence, negligence and inexcusable ignorance. To be continued...

Let there be light Sixth Part Extraordinary 147

Castro´s government's lack of respect for law and the reigning Impunity in Cuba when officials are involved not only did not make me give up, but made me more aggressive instead.  On January 1999, I sent Raul Castro, Army General and Minister of the Armed Forces then, 2 new complaints, in addition to another one I had written him on October 21st, 1998. And on May 4th, 1999 I put a report against Navy Commander Orlando Díaz Padrón, Chief of Fishing Inspection in Cienfuegos, for the crime of defamation. And on August 25th, 1999 I accused Martha Martínez Samalea, legal advisor of the Minister of Fishing, for the Crime of Prevarication. To be continued...

Let there be light Sixth Part Extraordinary 146

Seeing Castro´s government's lack of respect for law from the very beginning, I had decided to fight them hard. Just imagine that to finally take the five officials to Court it took me two years, three lawyers and almost every single judicial procedure available. Only in 1997: On January 30th Lawyer Antonio Gainza reported the crimes of  Tresspassing and Ilegal Search perpetrated in my home. On July 9th Lawyer Gainza impugned the answer given by the District Attorney's Office. On December 16th Lawyer Santiago Barceló Landeira filed for the Nullity of the Administrative Act of December 16th, 1996, for Illicit acting of inspectors of fishing, when violating their objective competition in my home. To be continued...

Let there be light Sixth Part Extraordinary 145

Cassation sentence No. 146/99 of October 7th,1999, finally absolved the three inspectors acting in the illegal search, discovering the gross fabrication conceived to help the colleague Officials, avoid the action of justice. But on November 25th I requested the Vice-Attorney General, Chief of The Military Prosecutor's Office, to promote the exam of cause 68 of 1999 of the Central Territorial Court-Martial, and the judicial Inspection of Cassation sentence No 146/99. But, to top it all, The answer of Colonel Felipe Aleman Cruz, Vice-Attorney General, Chief of the Military Prosecutor's Office, infringed flagrantly the precepts dictated in the Article 450 of the Military Penal Procedure Law, omitting to inform me the reasons he had in order not to give course to my request; violating in this way, additionally, Article 66 of Cuban Constitution. To be continued...

Let there be light Sixth Part Extraordinary 144

On August 3rd, 1999 the trial had to be repeated, and the sentence No. 117/99 again skipped to notice the crime of Trespassing; and although they found the five accused guilty of illegal search, the wording of the sentence laid the groundwork for the defense in order that a Cassation recourse might prosper eventually, and so being able to absolve the three inspectors finally. I presented Request of amendment of the sentence questioning the evident help given by the judge Major Luis Alberto Coca Valdes to the accused. But the request was obviously denied, adducing: “..it is trivial and empty of significance the substitution of the words used in the wording of the sentence for those suggested by the aggrieved, for the sustenance of the process.. ”. I had requested that in the FIRST RESULTING, in sheet 2 of the sentence, in line 20, instead of saying “the inspection and seek...” It should be consigned: “The search and seek...” Insofar as the FIRST POSTULATE was indicating as proven the consummated crime of Illegal Search. To be continued...