Let there be light Sixth Part Extraordinary 169

As a third line of opposition to Castros' dictatorship, once advanced my secret work of developing a well supported history of violations suffered by my family, and the state of impunity and violation of Constitutional and Human Rights reigning in Cuba, I started looking for ways out of the country to carry out my plans of an international Report. In December 2008 I got a passport and made several unsuccessful attempts with some friends to get out to Canada, because I had appreciated some new evidence of harassment, threats and persecution. A series of suspicious incidents began to take place, just after I had got a passport. In late January 2009, two uniformed policemen, accompanied by an armed civilian, fired two pistol shots at one o'clock in the morning at the entrance of my garden, leaving a shoe and a stick in the ground. When I came out and questioned about what had happened, they told me that a prisoner had escaped and had entered through my garden, and had jumped into the neighboring yard, and that they had shot him and missed. I did not believe that story and the next day I inquired in the neighborhood and in the village, and nobody knew anything about any escaped prisoner. I interpreted it as a clear warning that if I tried some activity against the Revolution they could kill me and blame an eventual convict. To be continued...

Let there be light Sixth Part Extraordinary 168

After July 2002, when I was forced to put a sudden end to my demands and accusations to avoid going to jail, I decided, as a first line of opposition to Castros' dictatorship, not to work ever more for the regime, showing my displeasure, and also avoiding any trap that they might have conceived to take me to court and then to prison, where any fatal end for my life was possible, in retaliation for the lawsuit I had starred, putting the Attorney General's Office, the supreme Court and the State Council in check. Secondly, I gave myself the task of carefully gathering all the documents I had compiled of the case; organize them, digitize them, classify them, sort them chronologically, make copies, hide them, guard them, study them deeply one by one; find all necessary legal literature to support the case, digitize it, organize it, study it, take notes, write several summaries with a view to the possible publication of a report abroad; translate all to English in order to expand the informative coverage; and above all, maintain the strictest discretion of what I was doing, to the extent of not sharing it with anyone, not even with my wife or my children. I had to be very careful to avoid that the Cuban State Security could come to know about my plans and could eliminate my opportunity to shed a little more light on the Untold Story of Castro's regime. To be continued...

Let there be light Sixth Part Extraordinay 167

For me, Justice and Democracy were in mourning in Cuba. Over nine complaints I addressed to President Fidel Castro, and to his Vice President Raul Castro, and all of them were in vain. To the Attorney General of Republic I cannot remember how many complaints and petitions I wrote; and all of them were useless. I can assure you that my case is neither the only one in Cuba, nor is it the most outstanding injustice; And if you do not believe it, let the Cubans tell us; I am looking forward to listen to them. To be continued...

Hágase la Luz Sexta Parte Extraordinaria 166

Comentario de Nicolás Aguila:

'Podemos' en cifras y hechos

1. ¿Cuántos militantes tiene el partido Podemos que dirige Pablo Iglesias?

250.000 militantes inscritos.

2. ¿Cuántos se inscribieron por internet para la elección del secretario general?

107.000.

3. ¿Cuántos de los inscritos votaron por Pablo Iglesias?

95.000, para un 88%.

4. ¿Qué requisitos se exigen para ser miembro de Podemos?

Ninguno hasta ahora.

5. ¿Cómo se financia Podemos?

Dado que sus militantes no pagan cuotas de membresía, es de suponer que sea financiado por sus aliados chavistas u otras fuentes parecidas.

6. ¿Cuál es el perfil del militante típico de Podemos?

Joven, urbano y universitario.

7. ¿Por qué no se presenta a las elecciones municipales de mayo 2015?

Porque se estrellaría como partido emergente al perder a nivel de pueblos y municipios.

8. ¿Podría llegar a gobernar?

No es probable que obtenga mayoría suficiente para gobernar, ni siquiera en la coyuntura más favorable, a no ser que se alíe con el PSOE y otras fuerzas políticas de izquierda. Pero puede alcanzar una representación significativa en las Cortes y en la comunidad de Madrid.

9. ¿No constituye una amenaza entonces?

De hecho ya es una amenaza. Es un grave peligro desde que obtuvo buenos resultados en las elecciones al Parlamento Europeo.

10. ¿Seguirá siendo el primer partido en intención de voto y alternativa al poder?

Más bien será la tercera fuerza política, después del PP y el PSOE, lo cual no es nada desdeñable. O sería la segunda, si el PSOE no levanta cabeza. Puede calcularse que obtenga entre el 10 y el 15% de los escaños al Parlamento en las elecciones generales. Tal vez un 20%.

Para mí es un Excelente comentario al cual yo sólo añadiría otras dos preguntas: ¿11-DEBEMOS detener el auge mediático inmerecido de PODEMOS? Pues claro que sí. Aunque opino que cuando el PODER no tiene sustento, como es el caso de PODEMOS, la caida está garantizada. 12-¿Por qué DEBEMOS detener ese improcedente apogeo de PODEMOS? Porque no PODEMOS permitir que una Cuba o una Venezuela, puedan resucitar en Europa, que bastante padeció con el Comunismo Soviético.

Let there be light Sixth Part Extraordinary 165

As it was expected, my apologies were accepted and the proceedings were ceased provisionally. It was evident then, first, that they knew they deserved every insult I had told them; second, that they didn't want to take me to a public trial with all the evidence they knew I had against them; and finally, that they were only interested in putting a happy end for them to the conflict, concealing all the violations and crimes they all had commited. They disregarded my reiteration of the clearly visible injustice (The Fine and confiscation), which my family had been victim of. All of a sudden, almost six years of stubborn struggle seemed to have got to an end. Now, after so many infractions suffered during that long time trying that legality be reestablished, together with my lack of faith in the Cuban leaders and their laws, I was not left with any other alternative than to wait patiently for the right moment to try to reopen the case. To be continued...

Let there be light Sixth Part Extraordinary 164

The apologizing letter to the Attorneys and Officials I had offended during the 5 years of my legal litigation can be summed up as follows: When I apologize as a man and as a citizen, I do not do it because of fear that you use the right of reporting me for having committed a possible crime, expressing myself of you, in the wrong and disrespectful way I did; but because I was convinced by my legal advisor that I had been unfair to you. But I think it is very important that you know, that even today, I still think that a FLAGRANT INJUSTICE was committed (Fine and confiscation), which has not been repaired, and it seems that the legal technical possibilities to achieve it are very remote. The Occupation of shrimp in my home refrigerator, which I have provided vast evidence of its legitimacy, was the result of unlawful acts, as an Illegal Search and the tresspassing of my home, for which two policemen were found guilty, but the Fishing and Labour inspectors have not. Finally, I feel better as a person if I knew that you accept my apologies, but please, do not cease exercising the right that can assist you to punish me for what I did; and it is fair so. I do not want you TO FEEL AS BAD AS I FEEL. To be continued...

Let there be light Sixth Part Extraordinary 163

Under such a serious accusation, I was forced to procure an experienced lawyer in Havana for legal advice, so Dr. Ivan Celestrín was my choice. And right after thoroughly studying the file that for the purpose I had conformed, he concluded that the best thing that I could do was to send an apologetic letter to each and every one of the officials that I had insulted in my reports, because although the reason might assist me, I should not expect justice in this new and decisive trial, if during five years I had not achieved it. Right away I interpreted his message. Now not only my freedom and my personal security in prison, was at stake, but my whole family's economic and psychic stability as well. Then, my new adviser wrote up the letter and got in charge himself of sending them to their destination. To be continued...

Let there be light Sixth Part Extraordinary 162

The answer to all those questions I have been asking these days is simple; they did not answer back to all my discharges and moral imputations in time, because they were aware that I was telling them pure facts and truths, which they were not able to legally reply. Then they decided to hold me in contempt as the only resource they had for putting an end to the bothersome process in which they got wrapped-up, right after realizing that their strategy of "fatigue" to impose their usual severe, example-giving and unjust measures, had not given them results with me as usual in these cases. Besides, as they were also obliged, at any cost, to obstruct the legal course of my well-founded accusation against General Juan Escalona Regueira, they decided to accuse me, with who knows what diabolical and unwholesome stratagem in mind. To be continued...

Let there be light Sixth Part Extraordinary 161

Why did the Attorney General's Office of the Republic tolerate my insults, and did not answer back on May 11th, 2001 when in impugnation to the Attorney General of the Republic, with copy to the Council of State, I rated the answer 00422 of April 13th, 2001 by Francisco Javier Fernandez Guerra, Assistance Director of the Attorney General's Office as ".. Illegal, arbitrary, concealing, unconstitutional, and unjust ". And I argued ": .. If Mr. Fernandez Guerra really examined the causes, he has to be as deceptive as the Vice-Attorney General, when he considers that I do not hold reason when I affirmed in the second argumentation of my complaint of January 3th, 2001, that the legal process in which I have been involved during the past 4 years has constituted a rude, gross, shameful, illegal, unjust and unconstitutional process"? To be continued...

Let there be light Sixth Part Extraordinary 160

Why did the Attorney General's Office of the Republic tolerate my insults, and did not answer back on January 3rd, 2001, when impugning answer R # 1918/2000 from Vice Attorney General, Rafael Pino Becquer, I considered it unfounded, illegal, unconstitutional and mainly unjust; and among other discharges, I presented that Vice Attorney General Pino Becquer, omitted to examine and to solve the most transcendental, unjust, illegal and unconstitutional antecedent of the whole file of the case in issue; missing the truth of the facts without reason; and then calls this rough, vulgar, shameful, illegal, unjust and unconstitutional process "Legal Paths"? To be continued...

Let there be light Sixth Part Extraordinary 159

Why did the Attorney General's Office of the Republic tolerate my insults, and did not answer back on November 2nd, 2000, when trying to formally procure in vain a personal interview with the Attorney General, protected in the right that article 63 of our Constitution was supposed to granted, I argued: "I am of the opinion that in this action procedure of Unconstitutionality, that I request to procure, there is an interest superior to that of mine and my family's one; it is the interest of the Constitutional supremacy, today dishonored by a small group of irresponsible and arrogant officials, that by chance, they have names and last names. They are named: 

Pedro Conde Martinez y Lázaro Navarro Perez, Cienfuegos Fishing inspectors.

Orlando Diaz Padrón, Director of Fishing inspection of Cienfuegos.

Martha Martinez Samalea, Legal adviser of the Minister of fishing.

Two judges, from the People's Municipal & Provincial Courts of Cienfuegos.

Urbano Pedraza Linares, Legal Assistance director of the Ministry of Justice.

Attorneys Orlando Martin Sanchez, Vladimir Núñez Herrera, Luis Pablo Ibáñez Silva, Angel Ortiz Nodarse, Maria del Carmen Romero Perez & Raúl López Pertierra.

Major Luis Alberto Coca Valdes, Cienfuegos Court-Martial President.

Lieutenant colonel Diego L. Valdes La Rosa, Central Territorial Court-Martial President.

Colonel Felipe Aleman Cruz, Vice-Attorney General, Chief of the Military Attorney's Office.

Lieutenant colonel Rafael Perez Martinez, Central Territorial Military Attorney.

Lieutenant colonel Fermin Perez Guerrero, Vice-Attorney substitute, Chief of the Military Attorney's Office. To be continued...

Let there be light Sixth Part Extraordinary 158

Why did the Attorney General's Office of the Republic tolerate my insults, and did not answer back on August 20th, 2000, when requesting the Council of State the separation of the District Attorney Maria Del Carmen Romero Perez, chief of the Direction of Civic Rights Protection of the Attorney General's Office of the Republic, for manifest incompetence, negligence or inexcusable ignorance; I Said:".. This is not the first time that I denounce the Negligent, illegal and even accessory attitude, of the Attorney Maria Del Carmen Romero, and she accepts it with silence and prevents my complaints on her getting to the Attorney General, answering them herself without referring to my discharges."? To be continued... 

Let there be light Sixth Part Extraordinary 157

Why did the Attorney General's Office of the Republic tolerate my insults, and did not answer back on July 20th, 2000 when impugning the answer 232537 of Havana City Provincial Attorney's Office, of date 4\6\2000, I denounced: ".. In front of the Evident complicity of several Attorneys in the Breaking-Up of the Legality observed in my case, which include the Attorneys Orlando Martin Sanchez, Vladimir Núñez Herrera, Luis Pablo Ibáñez Silva, Angel Ortiz Nodarse, Maria Del Carmen Romero Perez and Raúl López Pertierra, the last three ones of the Attorney General's Office of the Republic, against whom I have presented Complaints to the Attorney General in several occasions, without having been able to avoid that these complaints had been answered by the very implicated Attorneys.."? To be continued...

Let there be light Sixth Part Extraordinary 156

Why did the Attorney General's Office of the Republic tolerate my insults, and did not answer back on April 24th, 2000, when impugning the answer of the Attorney General's Office that denied my request of Revision Procedure of the cause 267/99 of the People's Municipal Court of Cienfuegos, settled for the crime of Defamation, I presented: "..Should he be very stupid or immoral the official that intends to search excuse in an alleged imperfection of Cuban Procedural Penal law to cover up or to conceal the Influential accused in issue.."? Why did the Attorney General's Office of the Republic tolerate my insults, and did not answer back on May 30th, 2000, when in impugnation addressed to the Attorney General of the Republic, against the answer 848 of the Provincial Attorney's Office of Cienfuegos, of date May 15th, 2000 I alleged: ".. The procedure and later answer given by Chief Attorney of the Provincial Attorney's Office of Cienfuegos, Luis Pablo Ibáñez Silva, could not be more superficial, negligent, paternalist, unjust and illegal? To be continued...

Let there be light Sixth Part Extraordinary 155

Why did the Attorney General's Office of the Republic tolerate my insults, and did not answer back on March 15th, 2000, when I wrote to Commander In Chief, Fidel Castro Ruz, denouncing among other things:

A.- "..The answer of the Attorney Vladimir Nuñez Herrera, was an insult to our family, to good judgment, to reason, to logic, to policy, to the Cuban laws, to his companions, to the Attorney General's Office, and to our lawyer Antonio Gainza.."

B.- ".. The legal adviser of the Minister of fishing, in an expression of pushiness, disdain, and disrespect to legality, omitted the duty of giving answer to our formal request; in violation of the article 63 of the Constitution of the Republic, and of the article 52 subsections r ) and a ) of the Law of Organization of the Central state Administration.."

C.- ".. It is outrageous and shameful, that a formal complaint that was made with legal assistance on January 30th, 1997 reaches the year 2000, and perhaps further, because of unscrupulous interests that avoid rectifying errors, at the expense of a grave economic , psychic and moral damage to an honest family, and more serious still, at the expense of the denigration of the judicial system.

D- ".. This is all the Vice Attorney General, Colonel Felipe Aleman Cruz, Chief of the Military Prosecutor's Office responded to a complaint that tells about flagrant Trespassing, abuse, denigration of our justice system, and immorality.? To be continued...